Tom 16/17 2019/2020
Przekłady

Dwustronna przyczynowość i rozszerzona synteza ewolucyjna

PDF

Opublikowane 20.01.2022 — zaktualizowane 23.01.2022

Wersje

Słowa kluczowe

  • przyczynowość,
  • teoria ewolucji,
  • wyjaśnienie,
  • rozszerzona synteza ewolucyjna
Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Jak cytować

Buskell, Andrew. “Dwustronna przyczynowość I Rozszerzona Synteza Ewolucyjna ”. 2022. Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy , translated byDariusz Sagan, Jan. 2022, pp. 157-92, https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2019-2020.16-17.6.

Abstrakt

Zespół Kevina Lalanda przedstawił liczne argumenty przemawiające za rozszerzoną syntezą ewolucyjną. W tym artykule analizuję kluczową dla tych uczonych koncepcję dwustronnej przyczynowości. Koncepcja ta przywoływana jest w wielu argumentach na rzecz przyjęcia rozszerzonej ewolucjonistycznej ramy pojęciowej, niewielka część tych argumentów jest jednak jasno sprecyzowana. Objaśniam tutaj tę koncepcję i przedstawiam trzy linie argumentacji, w których jest ona wykorzystywana. Wskazuję na to, w których punktach sceptycy mogą podważać — i podważają — te argumenty, jak również zwracam uwagę na główne, w moim przekonaniu, problemy empiryczne, eksplanacyjne i metodologiczne związane z tą koncepcją.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

  1. Amundson Ron, Two Concepts of Constraint: Adaptationism and the Challenge from Developmental Biology, Philosophy of Science 1994, vol. 61, no. 4, s. 556-578.
  2. Brakefield Paul M. and Frankino W. Anthony, Polyphenisms in Lepidoptera: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Studies of Evolution and Development, w: Whitman and Ananthakrishnan (eds.), Phenotypic Plasticity in Insects…, s. 337-368.
  3. Brigandt Ingo and Love Alan C., Evolutionary Novelty and the Evo-Devo Synthesis: Field Notes, Evolutionary Biology 2010, vol. 37, no. 2, s. 93-99.
  4. Brown Rachael L., What Evolvability Really Is, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2014, vol. 65, no. 3, s. 549-572.
  5. Buskell Andrew and Currie Adrian, Forces, Friction, and Fractionation: Denis Walsh’s Organisms, Agency, and Evolution, Biology & Philosophy 2017, vol. 32, no. 6, s. 1341-1353.
  6. Cain Joe, Rethinking the Synthesis Period in Evolutionary Studies, Journal of the History of Biology 2009, vol. 42, no. 4, s. 621-648.
  7. Calcott Brett, Why How and Why Aren’t Enough: More Problems with Mayr’s Proximate-Ultimate Distinction, Biology & Philosophy 2013, vol. 28, no. 5, s. 767–780.
  8. Carroll Sean B., Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo, Norton, New York 2005.
  9. Carroll Sean B., Evo-Devo and an Expanding Evolutionary Synthesis: A Genetic Theory of Morphological Evolution, Cell 2008, vol. 134, no. 1, s. 25-36.
  10. Charlesworth Deborah, Barton Nicholas H., and Charlesworth Brian, The Sources of Adaptive Variation, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2017, vol. 284, numer artykułu: 20162864.
  11. Clark Andy, Associative Engines: Connectionism, Concepts, and Representational Change, MIT Press, Cambridge 1993.
  12. DeWitt Thomas J. and Scheiner Samuel M., Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004.
  13. Dickins Thomas E. and Barton Robert A., Reciprocal Causation and the Proximate-Ultimate Distinction, Biology & Philosophy 2013, vol. 28, no. 5, s. 747-756.
  14. Dickins Thomas E. and Rahman Qazi, The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis and the Role of Soft Inheritance in Evolution, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2012, vol. 279, no. 1740, s. 2913-2921.
  15. Feldman Marcus W., Odling-Smee John, Laland Kevin N., Why Gupta et al.’s Critique of Niche Construction Theory Is Off Target, Journal of Genetics 2017, vol. 96, no. 3, s. 505-508.
  16. Fuentes Agustin, The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, Ethnography, and the Human Niche: Toward an Integrated Anthropology, Current Anthropology 2016, vol. 57, Supplement 13, s. S13-S26.
  17. Futuyma Douglas J., Evolutionary Biology Today and the Call for an Extended Synthesis, Interface Focus 2017, vol. 7, numer artykułu: 20160145, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0145.
  18. Futuyma Douglas J. and Kirkpatrick Mark, Evolution, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017.
  19. Gerhart John C. and Kirschner Marc W., The Theory of Facilitated Variation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2007, vol. 104, Supplement 1, s. 8582-8589.
  20. Godfrey-Smith Peter, Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
  21. Godfrey-Smith Peter, On the Status and Explanatory Structure of Developmental Systems Theory, w: Oyama, Griffiths, and Gray (eds.), Cycles of Contingency…, s. 283-298.
  22. Gould Stephen Jay, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2002.
  23. Griffiths Paul E. and Gray Russell D., Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation, The Journal of Philosophy 1994, vol. 91, no. 6, s. 277-304.
  24. Gupta Manan, Prasad N.G., Dey Sutirth, Joshi Amitabh, and Vidya T.N.C., Niche Construction in Evolutionary Theory: The Construction of an Academic Niche?, Journal of Genetics 2017, vol. 96, no. 3, s. 491-504.
  25. Gupta Manan, Prasad N.G., Dey Sutirth, Joshi Amitabh, and Vidya T.N.C., Feldman et al. Do Protest Too Much, We Think, Journal of Genetics 2017, vol. 96, no. 3, s. 509-511.
  26. Hoekstra Hopi E. and Coyne Jerry A., The Locus of Evolution: Evo Devo and the Genetics of Adaptation, Evolution 2007, vol. 61, no. 5, s. 995-1016.
  27. Hoekstra Hopi E., Hirschmann Rachel J., Bundey Richard A., Insel Paul A., and Crossland Janet P., A Single Amino Acid Mutation Contributes to Adaptive Beach Mice Color Pattern, Science 2006, vol. 313, no. 5783, s. 101-104.
  28. Huneman Philippe and Walsh Denis (eds.), Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, and Inheritance, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017.
  29. Jaeger Johannes, Irons David, and Monk Nick, The Inheritance of Process: A Dynamical Systems Approach, Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 2012, vol. 318, no. 8, s. 591-612.
  30. Kirschner Marc W. and Gerhart John C., The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma, Yale University Press, New Haven 2005.
  31. Kitcher Philip, The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1993.
  32. Kohler Robert E., Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1994.
  33. Kouvaris Kostas, Clune Jeff, Kounios Loizos, Brede Markus, Watson Richard A., How Evolution Learns to Generalise: Using the Principles of Learning Theory to Understand the Evolution of Developmental Organization, PLoS Computational Biology 2017, vol. 13, no. 4, numer artykułu: e1005358, https://doi.org/10.1371/journ al.pcbi.1005358.
  34. Kuhn Thomas S., Struktura rewolucji naukowych, przeł. Helena Ostromęcka i Justyna Nowotniak, Fundacja Aletheia, Warszawa 2001.
  35. Laland Kevin N., On Evolutionary Causes and Evolutionary Processes, Behavioural Processes 2015, vol. 117, s. 97-104.
  36. Laland Kevin N., Odling-Smee John, and Endler John, Niche Construction, Sources of Selection and Trait Coevolution, Interface Focus 2017, vol. 7, no. 5, numer artykułu: 20160147.
  37. Laland Kevin N., Odling-Smee John, Hoppitt William, and Uller Tobias, More on How and Why: Cause and Effect in Biology Revisited, Biology & Philosophy 2013, vol. 28, no. 5, s. 719-745.
  38. Laland Kevin N., Odling-Smee John, Hoppitt William, and Uller Tobias, More on How and Why: A Response to Commentaries, Biology & Philosophy 2013, vol. 28, no. 5, s. 793-810.
  39. Laland Kevin N., Sterelny Kim, Odling-Smee John, Hoppitt William, and Uller Tobias, Cause and Effect in Biology Revisited: Is Mayr’s Proximate-Ultimate Dichotomy Still Useful?, Science 2011, vol. 334, no. 6062, s. 1512-1516.
  40. Laland Kevin N., Uller Tobias, Feldman Marcus W., Sterelny Kim, Müller Gerd B. et al., Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink? Yes, Urgently, Nature 2014, vol. 514, s. 161-164.
  41. Laland Kevin N., Uller Tobias, Feldman Marcus W., Sterelny Kim, Müller Gerd B. et al., The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2015, vol. 282, no. 1813, numer artykułu: 20151019.
  42. Lean Christopher H., Indexically Structured Ecological Communities, Philosophy of Science 2018, vol. 85, no. 3, s. 501-522.
  43. Levins Richard and Lewontin Richard, The Dialectical Biologist, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1985.
  44. Lewens Tim, Cultural Evolution: Conceptual Challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
  45. Lewens Tim, Organisms and Artifacts: Design in Nature and Elsewhere, MIT Press, Cambridge 2004.
  46. Lewens Tim, Seven Types of Adaptationism, Biology & Philosophy 2009, vol. 24, no. 2, s. 161-182.
  47. Lively Curtis M., Predator-Induced Shell Dimorphism in the Acord Barnacle Chthamalus anisopoma, Evolution 1986, vol. 40, no. 2, s. 232-242.
  48. Lloyd Elisabeth A., Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly about Evolutionary Causes, Biological Theory 2015, vol. 10, s. 343-362.
  49. Lloyd Elisabeth A., The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2005.
  50. Logan Corina J., Avin Shahar, Boogert Neeltje, Buskell Andrew, Cross Fiona R., Currie Adrian, Jelbert Sarah, Lukas Dieter, Mares Rafael, Navarrete Ana F., Shigeno Shuichi, and Montgomery Stephen H., Beyond Brain Size: Uncovering the Neural Correlates of Behavioral and Cognitive Specialization, Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews 2018, vol. 13, s. 55-90.
  51. Love Alan C., Evo-Devo and the Structure of Evolutionary Theory, w: Huneman and Walsh (eds.), Challenging the Modern Synthesis…, s. 159-187.
  52. Love Alan C., Rethinking the Structure of Evolutionary Theory for an Extended Synthesis, w: Pigliucci and Müller (eds.), Evolution: The Extended Synthesis…, s. 403–442.
  53. Love Alan C., Theory Is as Theory Does: Scientific Practice and Theory Structure in Biology, Biological Theory 2013, vol. 7, no. 4, s. 325-337.
  54. Lu Qiaoying and Bourrat Pierrick, The Evolutionary Gene and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2018, vol. 69, no. 3, s. 775-800.
  55. Martin Arnaud, Serano Julia M., Jarvis Erin, Bruce Heather S., Wang Jennifer, Shagnik Ray, Barker Carryn A., O’Connell Liam C., and Patel Nipam H., CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis Reveals Versatile Roles of Hox Genes in Crustacean Limb Specification and Evolution, Current Biology 2016, vol. 26, no. 1, s. 14-26.
  56. Martínez Maximiliano and Esposito Maurizio, Multilevel Causation and the Extended Synthesis, Biological Theory 2014, vol. 9, no. 2, s. 209-220.
  57. Maynard Smith John and Szathmáry Eörs, The Major Transitions in Evolution, W.H. Freeman, Oxford 1995.
  58. Mayr Ernst and Provine William B. (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1980.
  59. Mesoudi Alex, Blanchet Simon, Charmantier Anne, Danchin Étienne, Fogarty Laurel, Jablonka Eva, Laland Kevin N., Morgan Thomas J.H., Müller Gerd B., Odling-Smee F. John, and Pujol Benoît, Is Non-Genetic Inheritance Just a Proximate Mechanism? A Corroboration of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, Biological Theory 2013, vol. 7, no. 3, s. 189-195.
  60. Milam Erika L., The Equally Wonderful Field: Ernst Mayr and Organismic Biology, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 2010, vol. 40, no. 3, s. 279-317.
  61. Müller Gerd B., Dlaczego rozszerzona synteza ewolucyjna jest niezbędna, przeł. Dariusz Sagan, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2018, t. 15, s. 371-413, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/images/FAG/2018.t.15/art.08.pdf [14.09.2021].
  62. Müller Gerd B., Evo-Devo: Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis, Nature Reviews Genetics 2007, vol. 8, no. 12, s. 943-949.
  63. Murren Courtney J., Auld J.R., Callahan Hilary, Ghalambor Cameron K., Handelsman Corey A. et al., Constraints on the Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity: Limits and Costs of Phenotype and Plasticity, Heredity 2015, vol. 115, no. 4, s. 293-301.
  64. Odling-Smee John, Laland Kevin N., and Feldman Marcus W., Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2003.
  65. Oyama Susan, The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution, Duke University Press, Durham 2000.
  66. Oyama Susan, Griffiths Paul E., and Russell D. Gray (eds.), Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, Life and Mind: Philosophical Issues in Biology and Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge 2001.
  67. Pigliucci Massimo, An Extended Synthesis for Evolutionary Biology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009, vol. 1168, s. 218-228.
  68. Pigliucci Massimo, Do We Need an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis?, Evolution 2007, vol. 61, no. 12, s. 2743-2749.
  69. Pigliucci Massimo and Müller Gerd B., Elements of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, w: Pigliucci and Müller (eds.), Evolution: The Extended Synthesis…, s. 3-17.
  70. Pigliucci Massimo and Müller Gerd B. (eds.), Evolution: The Extended Synthesis, MIT Press, Cambridge 2010.
  71. Piperno Dolores R., Assessing Elements of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis for Plant Domestication and Agricultural Origin Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2017, vol. 114, no. 25, s. 6429-6437.
  72. Provine William B., Epilogue, w: Mayr and Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis…, s. 399-411.
  73. Provine William B., The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1971.
  74. Raff Rudolf A., The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1996.
  75. Robert Jason Scott, Embryology, Epigenesis, and Evolution: Taking Development Seriously, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.
  76. Salazar-Ciudad Isaac, Developmental Constraints vs. Variational Properties: How Pattern Formation Can Help to Understand Evolution and Development, Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 2006, vol. 306B, no. 2, s. 107-125.
  77. Salazar-Ciudad Isaac, On the Origins of Morphological Disparity and Its Diverse Developmental Bases, BioEssays 2006, vol. 28, no. 11, s. 1112-1122.
  78. Salazar-Ciudad Isaac and Marín-Riera Miquel, Adaptive Dynamics under Development-Based Genotype-Phenotype Maps, Nature 2013, vol. 497, s. 361-364.
  79. Schlicting Carl D. and Pigliucci Massimo, Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland 1998.
  80. Schoeppner Nancy M. and Relyea Rick A., Detecting Small Environmental Differences: Risk-Response Curves for Predator-Induced Behavior and Morphology, Oecologia 2008, vol. 154, no. 4, s. 743-754.
  81. Shapin Steven and Schaffer Simon, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton Classics, vol. 109, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1985.
  82. Smocovitis Vassiliki B., Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1996.
  83. Svensson Erik I., On Reciprocal Causation in the Evolutionary Process, Evolutionary Biology 2018, vol. 45, no. 1, s. 1-14.
  84. Turner J. Scott, The Extended Organism: The Physiology of Animal-Built Structures, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2000.
  85. Uller Tobias and Helanterä Heikki, Niche Construction and Conceptual Change in Evolutionary Biology, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2019, vol. 70, no. 2, s. 351-375.
  86. Vohradsky Jirí, Neural Model of the Genetic Network, Journal of Biological Chemistry 2001, vol. 276, no. 39, s. 36168-36173.
  87. Vohradsky Jirí, Neural Network Model of Gene Expression, Federation of American Societes for Experimental Biology Journal 2001, vol. 15, s. 846-854.
  88. Walsh Denis M., Organisms, Agency, and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
  89. Watson Richard A., Mills Rob, Buckley C.L., Kouvaris Kostas, Jackson Adam, Powers Simon T., Cox Chris, Tudge Simon, Davies Adam, Kounios Loizos, and Power Daniel, Evolutionary Connectionism: Algorithmic Principles Underlying the Evolution of Biological Organisation in Evo-Devo, Evo-Eco and Evolutionary Transitions, Evolutionary Biology 2016, vol. 43, no. 4, s. 553-581.
  90. Watson Richard A., Wagner Günter P., Pavlicev Mihaela, Weinreich Daniel M., and Mills Rob, The Evolution of Phenotypic Correlations and «Developmental Memory», Evolution 2014, vol. 68, no. 4, s. 1124-1138.
  91. Watson Richard A. and Szathmáry Eörs, How Can Evolution Learn?, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2016, vol. 31, no. 2, s. 147-157.
  92. Welch John J., What’s Wrong with Evolutionary Biology?, Biology & Philosophy 2017, vol. 32, no. 2, s. 263-279.
  93. West-Eberhard Mary Jane, Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003.
  94. Whitman Douglas W. and Ananthakrishnan T.N. (eds.), Phenotypic Plasticity in Insects: Mechanisms and Consequences, CRC Press, Enfield 2009.
  95. Williams George C., Gaia, Nature Worship and Biocentric Fallacies, Quarterly Review of Biology 1992, vol. 67, no. 4, s. 479-486.
  96. Woodward James, Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003.
  97. Wray Gregory A., Hoekstra Hopi E., Futuyma Douglas J., Lenski Richard E., Mackay Trudi F.C. et al., Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink? No, All Is Well, Nature 2014, vol. 514, s. 161-164.
  98. Young Nathan M., Wagner Günter P., and Hallgrímsson Benedikt, Development and the Evolvability of Human Limbs, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010, vol. 107, no. 8, s. 3400-3405.
  99. Zeder Melinda A., Domestication as a Model System for the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, Interface Focus 2017, vol. 7, numer artykułu: 20160133, https ://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0133.