Tom 16/17 2019/2020
Przekłady

Dwustronna przyczynowość i rozszerzona synteza ewolucyjna

PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2019-2020.16-17.6

Opublikowane 20.01.2022 — zaktualizowane 23.01.2022

Wersje

Słowa kluczowe

  • przyczynowość,
  • teoria ewolucji,
  • wyjaśnienie,
  • rozszerzona synteza ewolucyjna

Jak cytować

Buskell A., Sagan D., Dwustronna przyczynowość i rozszerzona synteza ewolucyjna , Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, 2022, s. 157-192, https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2019-2020.16-17.6
Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Abstrakt

Zespół Kevina Lalanda przedstawił liczne argumenty przemawiające za rozszerzoną syntezą ewolucyjną. W tym artykule analizuję kluczową dla tych uczonych koncepcję dwustronnej przyczynowości. Koncepcja ta przywoływana jest w wielu argumentach na rzecz przyjęcia rozszerzonej ewolucjonistycznej ramy pojęciowej, niewielka część tych argumentów jest jednak jasno sprecyzowana. Objaśniam tutaj tę koncepcję i przedstawiam trzy linie argumentacji, w których jest ona wykorzystywana. Wskazuję na to, w których punktach sceptycy mogą podważać — i podważają — te argumenty, jak również zwracam uwagę na główne, w moim przekonaniu, problemy empiryczne, eksplanacyjne i metodologiczne związane z tą koncepcją.

PDF

Pobrania

Brak dostęþnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

  1. Amundson Ron, Two Concepts of Constraint: Adaptationism and the Challenge from Developmental Biology, Philosophy of Science 1994, vol. 61, no. 4, s. 556-578.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  2. Brakefield Paul M. and Frankino W. Anthony, Polyphenisms in Lepidoptera: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Studies of Evolution and Development, w: Whitman and Ananthakrishnan (eds.), Phenotypic Plasticity in Insects…, s. 337-368.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  3. Brigandt Ingo and Love Alan C., Evolutionary Novelty and the Evo-Devo Synthesis: Field Notes, Evolutionary Biology 2010, vol. 37, no. 2, s. 93-99.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  4. Brown Rachael L., What Evolvability Really Is, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2014, vol. 65, no. 3, s. 549-572.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  5. Buskell Andrew and Currie Adrian, Forces, Friction, and Fractionation: Denis Walsh’s Organisms, Agency, and Evolution, Biology & Philosophy 2017, vol. 32, no. 6, s. 1341-1353.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  6. Cain Joe, Rethinking the Synthesis Period in Evolutionary Studies, Journal of the History of Biology 2009, vol. 42, no. 4, s. 621-648.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  7. Calcott Brett, Why How and Why Aren’t Enough: More Problems with Mayr’s Proximate-Ultimate Distinction, Biology & Philosophy 2013, vol. 28, no. 5, s. 767–780.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  8. Carroll Sean B., Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo, Norton, New York 2005.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  9. Carroll Sean B., Evo-Devo and an Expanding Evolutionary Synthesis: A Genetic Theory of Morphological Evolution, Cell 2008, vol. 134, no. 1, s. 25-36.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  10. Charlesworth Deborah, Barton Nicholas H., and Charlesworth Brian, The Sources of Adaptive Variation, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2017, vol. 284, numer artykułu: 20162864.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  11. Clark Andy, Associative Engines: Connectionism, Concepts, and Representational Change, MIT Press, Cambridge 1993.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  12. DeWitt Thomas J. and Scheiner Samuel M., Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  13. Dickins Thomas E. and Barton Robert A., Reciprocal Causation and the Proximate-Ultimate Distinction, Biology & Philosophy 2013, vol. 28, no. 5, s. 747-756.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  14. Dickins Thomas E. and Rahman Qazi, The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis and the Role of Soft Inheritance in Evolution, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2012, vol. 279, no. 1740, s. 2913-2921.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  15. Feldman Marcus W., Odling-Smee John, Laland Kevin N., Why Gupta et al.’s Critique of Niche Construction Theory Is Off Target, Journal of Genetics 2017, vol. 96, no. 3, s. 505-508.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  16. Fuentes Agustin, The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, Ethnography, and the Human Niche: Toward an Integrated Anthropology, Current Anthropology 2016, vol. 57, Supplement 13, s. S13-S26.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  17. Futuyma Douglas J., Evolutionary Biology Today and the Call for an Extended Synthesis, Interface Focus 2017, vol. 7, numer artykułu: 20160145, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0145.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  18. Futuyma Douglas J. and Kirkpatrick Mark, Evolution, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  19. Gerhart John C. and Kirschner Marc W., The Theory of Facilitated Variation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2007, vol. 104, Supplement 1, s. 8582-8589.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  20. Godfrey-Smith Peter, Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  21. Godfrey-Smith Peter, On the Status and Explanatory Structure of Developmental Systems Theory, w: Oyama, Griffiths, and Gray (eds.), Cycles of Contingency…, s. 283-298.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  22. Gould Stephen Jay, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2002.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  23. Griffiths Paul E. and Gray Russell D., Developmental Systems and Evolutionary Explanation, The Journal of Philosophy 1994, vol. 91, no. 6, s. 277-304.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  24. Gupta Manan, Prasad N.G., Dey Sutirth, Joshi Amitabh, and Vidya T.N.C., Niche Construction in Evolutionary Theory: The Construction of an Academic Niche?, Journal of Genetics 2017, vol. 96, no. 3, s. 491-504.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  25. Gupta Manan, Prasad N.G., Dey Sutirth, Joshi Amitabh, and Vidya T.N.C., Feldman et al. Do Protest Too Much, We Think, Journal of Genetics 2017, vol. 96, no. 3, s. 509-511.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  26. Hoekstra Hopi E. and Coyne Jerry A., The Locus of Evolution: Evo Devo and the Genetics of Adaptation, Evolution 2007, vol. 61, no. 5, s. 995-1016.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  27. Hoekstra Hopi E., Hirschmann Rachel J., Bundey Richard A., Insel Paul A., and Crossland Janet P., A Single Amino Acid Mutation Contributes to Adaptive Beach Mice Color Pattern, Science 2006, vol. 313, no. 5783, s. 101-104.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  28. Huneman Philippe and Walsh Denis (eds.), Challenging the Modern Synthesis: Adaptation, Development, and Inheritance, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2017.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  29. Jaeger Johannes, Irons David, and Monk Nick, The Inheritance of Process: A Dynamical Systems Approach, Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 2012, vol. 318, no. 8, s. 591-612.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  30. Kirschner Marc W. and Gerhart John C., The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma, Yale University Press, New Haven 2005.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  31. Kitcher Philip, The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend, Objectivity Without Illusions, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1993.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  32. Kohler Robert E., Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1994.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  33. Kouvaris Kostas, Clune Jeff, Kounios Loizos, Brede Markus, Watson Richard A., How Evolution Learns to Generalise: Using the Principles of Learning Theory to Understand the Evolution of Developmental Organization, PLoS Computational Biology 2017, vol. 13, no. 4, numer artykułu: e1005358, https://doi.org/10.1371/journ al.pcbi.1005358.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  34. Kuhn Thomas S., Struktura rewolucji naukowych, przeł. Helena Ostromęcka i Justyna Nowotniak, Fundacja Aletheia, Warszawa 2001.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  35. Laland Kevin N., On Evolutionary Causes and Evolutionary Processes, Behavioural Processes 2015, vol. 117, s. 97-104.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  36. Laland Kevin N., Odling-Smee John, and Endler John, Niche Construction, Sources of Selection and Trait Coevolution, Interface Focus 2017, vol. 7, no. 5, numer artykułu: 20160147.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  37. Laland Kevin N., Odling-Smee John, Hoppitt William, and Uller Tobias, More on How and Why: Cause and Effect in Biology Revisited, Biology & Philosophy 2013, vol. 28, no. 5, s. 719-745.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  38. Laland Kevin N., Odling-Smee John, Hoppitt William, and Uller Tobias, More on How and Why: A Response to Commentaries, Biology & Philosophy 2013, vol. 28, no. 5, s. 793-810.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  39. Laland Kevin N., Sterelny Kim, Odling-Smee John, Hoppitt William, and Uller Tobias, Cause and Effect in Biology Revisited: Is Mayr’s Proximate-Ultimate Dichotomy Still Useful?, Science 2011, vol. 334, no. 6062, s. 1512-1516.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  40. Laland Kevin N., Uller Tobias, Feldman Marcus W., Sterelny Kim, Müller Gerd B. et al., Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink? Yes, Urgently, Nature 2014, vol. 514, s. 161-164.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  41. Laland Kevin N., Uller Tobias, Feldman Marcus W., Sterelny Kim, Müller Gerd B. et al., The Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Its Structure, Assumptions and Predictions, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2015, vol. 282, no. 1813, numer artykułu: 20151019.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  42. Lean Christopher H., Indexically Structured Ecological Communities, Philosophy of Science 2018, vol. 85, no. 3, s. 501-522.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  43. Levins Richard and Lewontin Richard, The Dialectical Biologist, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1985.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  44. Lewens Tim, Cultural Evolution: Conceptual Challenges, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2015.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  45. Lewens Tim, Organisms and Artifacts: Design in Nature and Elsewhere, MIT Press, Cambridge 2004.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  46. Lewens Tim, Seven Types of Adaptationism, Biology & Philosophy 2009, vol. 24, no. 2, s. 161-182.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  47. Lively Curtis M., Predator-Induced Shell Dimorphism in the Acord Barnacle Chthamalus anisopoma, Evolution 1986, vol. 40, no. 2, s. 232-242.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  48. Lloyd Elisabeth A., Adaptationism and the Logic of Research Questions: How to Think Clearly about Evolutionary Causes, Biological Theory 2015, vol. 10, s. 343-362.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  49. Lloyd Elisabeth A., The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2005.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  50. Logan Corina J., Avin Shahar, Boogert Neeltje, Buskell Andrew, Cross Fiona R., Currie Adrian, Jelbert Sarah, Lukas Dieter, Mares Rafael, Navarrete Ana F., Shigeno Shuichi, and Montgomery Stephen H., Beyond Brain Size: Uncovering the Neural Correlates of Behavioral and Cognitive Specialization, Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews 2018, vol. 13, s. 55-90.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  51. Love Alan C., Evo-Devo and the Structure of Evolutionary Theory, w: Huneman and Walsh (eds.), Challenging the Modern Synthesis…, s. 159-187.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  52. Love Alan C., Rethinking the Structure of Evolutionary Theory for an Extended Synthesis, w: Pigliucci and Müller (eds.), Evolution: The Extended Synthesis…, s. 403–442.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  53. Love Alan C., Theory Is as Theory Does: Scientific Practice and Theory Structure in Biology, Biological Theory 2013, vol. 7, no. 4, s. 325-337.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  54. Lu Qiaoying and Bourrat Pierrick, The Evolutionary Gene and the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2018, vol. 69, no. 3, s. 775-800.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  55. Martin Arnaud, Serano Julia M., Jarvis Erin, Bruce Heather S., Wang Jennifer, Shagnik Ray, Barker Carryn A., O’Connell Liam C., and Patel Nipam H., CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis Reveals Versatile Roles of Hox Genes in Crustacean Limb Specification and Evolution, Current Biology 2016, vol. 26, no. 1, s. 14-26.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  56. Martínez Maximiliano and Esposito Maurizio, Multilevel Causation and the Extended Synthesis, Biological Theory 2014, vol. 9, no. 2, s. 209-220.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  57. Maynard Smith John and Szathmáry Eörs, The Major Transitions in Evolution, W.H. Freeman, Oxford 1995.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  58. Mayr Ernst and Provine William B. (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1980.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  59. Mesoudi Alex, Blanchet Simon, Charmantier Anne, Danchin Étienne, Fogarty Laurel, Jablonka Eva, Laland Kevin N., Morgan Thomas J.H., Müller Gerd B., Odling-Smee F. John, and Pujol Benoît, Is Non-Genetic Inheritance Just a Proximate Mechanism? A Corroboration of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, Biological Theory 2013, vol. 7, no. 3, s. 189-195.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  60. Milam Erika L., The Equally Wonderful Field: Ernst Mayr and Organismic Biology, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 2010, vol. 40, no. 3, s. 279-317.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  61. Müller Gerd B., Dlaczego rozszerzona synteza ewolucyjna jest niezbędna, przeł. Dariusz Sagan, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2018, t. 15, s. 371-413, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/images/FAG/2018.t.15/art.08.pdf [14.09.2021].
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  62. Müller Gerd B., Evo-Devo: Extending the Evolutionary Synthesis, Nature Reviews Genetics 2007, vol. 8, no. 12, s. 943-949.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  63. Murren Courtney J., Auld J.R., Callahan Hilary, Ghalambor Cameron K., Handelsman Corey A. et al., Constraints on the Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity: Limits and Costs of Phenotype and Plasticity, Heredity 2015, vol. 115, no. 4, s. 293-301.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  64. Odling-Smee John, Laland Kevin N., and Feldman Marcus W., Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2003.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  65. Oyama Susan, The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution, Duke University Press, Durham 2000.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  66. Oyama Susan, Griffiths Paul E., and Russell D. Gray (eds.), Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution, Life and Mind: Philosophical Issues in Biology and Psychology, MIT Press, Cambridge 2001.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  67. Pigliucci Massimo, An Extended Synthesis for Evolutionary Biology, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009, vol. 1168, s. 218-228.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  68. Pigliucci Massimo, Do We Need an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis?, Evolution 2007, vol. 61, no. 12, s. 2743-2749.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  69. Pigliucci Massimo and Müller Gerd B., Elements of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, w: Pigliucci and Müller (eds.), Evolution: The Extended Synthesis…, s. 3-17.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  70. Pigliucci Massimo and Müller Gerd B. (eds.), Evolution: The Extended Synthesis, MIT Press, Cambridge 2010.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  71. Piperno Dolores R., Assessing Elements of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis for Plant Domestication and Agricultural Origin Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2017, vol. 114, no. 25, s. 6429-6437.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  72. Provine William B., Epilogue, w: Mayr and Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis…, s. 399-411.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  73. Provine William B., The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1971.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  74. Raff Rudolf A., The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1996.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  75. Robert Jason Scott, Embryology, Epigenesis, and Evolution: Taking Development Seriously, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  76. Salazar-Ciudad Isaac, Developmental Constraints vs. Variational Properties: How Pattern Formation Can Help to Understand Evolution and Development, Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 2006, vol. 306B, no. 2, s. 107-125.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  77. Salazar-Ciudad Isaac, On the Origins of Morphological Disparity and Its Diverse Developmental Bases, BioEssays 2006, vol. 28, no. 11, s. 1112-1122.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  78. Salazar-Ciudad Isaac and Marín-Riera Miquel, Adaptive Dynamics under Development-Based Genotype-Phenotype Maps, Nature 2013, vol. 497, s. 361-364.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  79. Schlicting Carl D. and Pigliucci Massimo, Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland 1998.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  80. Schoeppner Nancy M. and Relyea Rick A., Detecting Small Environmental Differences: Risk-Response Curves for Predator-Induced Behavior and Morphology, Oecologia 2008, vol. 154, no. 4, s. 743-754.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  81. Shapin Steven and Schaffer Simon, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life, Princeton Classics, vol. 109, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1985.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  82. Smocovitis Vassiliki B., Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1996.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  83. Svensson Erik I., On Reciprocal Causation in the Evolutionary Process, Evolutionary Biology 2018, vol. 45, no. 1, s. 1-14.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  84. Turner J. Scott, The Extended Organism: The Physiology of Animal-Built Structures, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2000.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  85. Uller Tobias and Helanterä Heikki, Niche Construction and Conceptual Change in Evolutionary Biology, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2019, vol. 70, no. 2, s. 351-375.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  86. Vohradsky Jirí, Neural Model of the Genetic Network, Journal of Biological Chemistry 2001, vol. 276, no. 39, s. 36168-36173.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  87. Vohradsky Jirí, Neural Network Model of Gene Expression, Federation of American Societes for Experimental Biology Journal 2001, vol. 15, s. 846-854.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  88. Walsh Denis M., Organisms, Agency, and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  89. Watson Richard A., Mills Rob, Buckley C.L., Kouvaris Kostas, Jackson Adam, Powers Simon T., Cox Chris, Tudge Simon, Davies Adam, Kounios Loizos, and Power Daniel, Evolutionary Connectionism: Algorithmic Principles Underlying the Evolution of Biological Organisation in Evo-Devo, Evo-Eco and Evolutionary Transitions, Evolutionary Biology 2016, vol. 43, no. 4, s. 553-581.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  90. Watson Richard A., Wagner Günter P., Pavlicev Mihaela, Weinreich Daniel M., and Mills Rob, The Evolution of Phenotypic Correlations and «Developmental Memory», Evolution 2014, vol. 68, no. 4, s. 1124-1138.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  91. Watson Richard A. and Szathmáry Eörs, How Can Evolution Learn?, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2016, vol. 31, no. 2, s. 147-157.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  92. Welch John J., What’s Wrong with Evolutionary Biology?, Biology & Philosophy 2017, vol. 32, no. 2, s. 263-279.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  93. West-Eberhard Mary Jane, Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  94. Whitman Douglas W. and Ananthakrishnan T.N. (eds.), Phenotypic Plasticity in Insects: Mechanisms and Consequences, CRC Press, Enfield 2009.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  95. Williams George C., Gaia, Nature Worship and Biocentric Fallacies, Quarterly Review of Biology 1992, vol. 67, no. 4, s. 479-486.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  96. Woodward James, Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  97. Wray Gregory A., Hoekstra Hopi E., Futuyma Douglas J., Lenski Richard E., Mackay Trudi F.C. et al., Does Evolutionary Theory Need a Rethink? No, All Is Well, Nature 2014, vol. 514, s. 161-164.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  98. Young Nathan M., Wagner Günter P., and Hallgrímsson Benedikt, Development and the Evolvability of Human Limbs, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2010, vol. 107, no. 8, s. 3400-3405.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  99. Zeder Melinda A., Domestication as a Model System for the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, Interface Focus 2017, vol. 7, numer artykułu: 20160133, https ://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0133.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar