Tom 20 Nr 2 (2023)
Artykuły

Riffing on Feyerabend: Direct Observation, Paraconsistentist Logic, and a Research Immanent Account of the Rationaliy of Science

PDF (Angielski)
  • George Couvalis
George Couvalis
Independent Researcher

Opublikowane 15.02.2024

Wersje

Słowa kluczowe

  • Feyerabend,
  • history and philosophy of science,
  • inconsistency,
  • paraconsistency,
  • philosophy of science,
  • scientific rationality,
  • Shapere
    • ...More
    Less

Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Jak cytować

Couvalis, George. “Riffing on Feyerabend: Direct Observation, Paraconsistentist Logic, and a Research Immanent Account of the Rationaliy of Science”. Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy , vol. 20, no. 2, Feb. 2024, https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2023.20.2.225.

Abstrakt

Feyerabend’s work, particularly his early papers contain important insights into the nature of science and scientific progress. I discuss his insights into the limits of empiricist foundationalism and positivism. I explain how the work of a number of philosophers has borne out Feyerabend’s claims in startling and interesting ways. Nevertheless, I criticise Feyerabend’s move from his attack on universal method to relativism. I point out that Feyerabend never confronted a well-developed research immanent view of the rationality of scientific change, which shows the limitations of the arguments in Against Method.

PDF (Angielski)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

  1. Anderson Alan, Belnap Nuel, and Dunn Michael (eds.), Entailment 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1976.
  2. Brown Bryson and Priest Graham, Chunk and Permeate, a Paraconsistentist Inference Strategy, Part 1: The Infinitesimal Calculus, Journal of Philosophical Logic 2004, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 379–388, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LOGI.0000036831.48866.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LOGI.0000036831.48866.12
  3. Chalmers Alan, The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 279, Springer, Dordrecht 2009.
  4. Chang Hasok, Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress, Oxford University Press, New York 2007.
  5. Couvalis George, Feyerabend, Critique of Rationality in Science, in: Byron Kaldis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences, Volume 1, Sage Publications, London 2013, pp. 356–359.
  6. Couvalis George and Usher Mathew, Plato on False Pains and Modern Cognitive Science, Philosophical Inquiry 2003, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 99–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philinquiry2003253/441
  7. Chalmers Alan, Science and its Fabrication, Open University Press, Milton Keynes 1990.
  8. Couvalis George, Feyerabend’s Critique of Foundationalism, Avebury, Aldershot 1989.
  9. Couvalis George, The Philosophy of Science, Sage, London 1997.
  10. Drake Stillman, Galileo at Work, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1978.
  11. Feyerabend Paul, Against Method, Third Edition, Verso Books, London 1993.
  12. Feyerabend Paul, On the Interpretation of Scientific Theories (1960), in: Paul Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers, Volume 1, Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1981, p. 37–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171526.004
  13. Feyerabend Paul, The Problem of Theoretical Entities (1960), trans. from the German Daniel Sirtes and Eric Oberheim, trans. from the German by Daniel Sirtes and Eric Oberheim, in: Paul Feyerabend, Philosophical Papers, Volume 3, Knowledge, Science and Relativism, Cambridge — New York — Melbourne, Cambridge University Press 1999, pp. 16¬–49.
  14. Fodor Jerry, Observation Reconsidered, Philosophy of Science 1984, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 23–43, https://www.jstor.org/stable/187729 [15.09.2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/289162
  15. Fodor Jerry, The Dogma that Didn’t Bark, Mind 1991, Vol. 100, No. 2, p. 202 [201–220], https://www.jstor.org/stable/2254867 [15.09.2023].
  16. Fox Robert, The Caloric Theory of Gases, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1971.
  17. Grahek Nicola, Feeling Pain and Being in Pain, MIT Press, Cambridge 2011.
  18. Hardcastle Gray, The Myth of Pain, MIT Press, Cambridge 2001.
  19. Mortensen Chris, Inconsistent Geometry, Studies in Logic, Volume 27, College Publications, London 2010.
  20. Mortensen Chris, The Impossible Arises, Oscar Reutesvärd and his Contemporaries, Indiana University Press, Bloomington 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2p7j6gq
  21. Roller Duane, Case 3: The Early Development of Temperature and Heat, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1950.
  22. Shapere Dudley, The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy, Philosophy of Science 1982, Vol. 49, No. 4, p. 485–525, https://www.jstor.org/stable/187163 [15.09.2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/289075
  23. Routley Richard, Meyer Robert, Plumwood Valerie, and Brady Ross, Relevant Logics and Their Rivals 1, Ridgeview Publishing, Atrascadero 1982.
  24. Shapere Dudley, The Character of Scientific Change (1983), in: Dudley Shapere, Reason and the Search for Knowledge, Reidel, Dordrecht 1984, pp. 205–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9731-4_11
  25. Shapere Dudley, The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy (summary version), in: Dudley Shapere (ed.), Reason and the Search for Knowledge, Dordrecht, Reidel 1984, pp. 342–351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9731-4_16
  26. Tranekjaer–Rasmussen Edgar, On Perspectoid Distances, Acta Psychologica 1955, Vol. 11, pp. 297–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(55)80093-5
  27. Quine Willard, From a Logical Point of View, Norton, New York 1961.
  28. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2002/summary/ [15.09.2023].