Tom 20 Nr 1 (2023)
Listy do Redakcji

Why Do Academics Not Seriously Consider Intelligent Design?

PDF (English)
  • Michael Behe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2023.20.1.219

Opublikowane 17.08.2023 — zaktualizowane 14.09.2023

Wersje

Jak cytować

Behe M., Why Do Academics Not Seriously Consider Intelligent Design?, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, 2023, t. 20, nr 1, s. 155-164, https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2023.20.1.219

Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

PDF (English)

Pobrania

Brak dostęþnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

  1. Ananthaswamy Anil, Particle, Wave, Both or Neither? The Experiment that Challenges All We Know About Reality, Nature 2023, Vol. 618, No. 7965, pp. 454–456, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01938-6.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01938-6
  2. Avise John C., Inside the Human Genome: A Case for Non-Intelligent Design, Oxford University Press, Oxford — New York 2007.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  3. Ayala Francisco J., Darwin’s Gift to Science and Religion, Joseph Henry Press, Washington 2007.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  4. Barr Stephen M., Modern Physics and Ancient Faith, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame 2003.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  5. Behe Michael J., Irreducible Complexity: Obstacle to Darwinian Evolution, in: Michael Ruse and William Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA, Cambridge University Press, New York 2004, pp. 352–370.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804823.020
  6. Cartwright Nancy, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1983.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198247044.001.0001
  7. Collins Francis S., The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief, Free Press, New York 2006.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  8. Flew Antony and Varghese Roy Abraham, There Is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind, HarperOne, New York 2007.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0922.2008.00240_3.x
  9. Haldane John Burdon Sanderson, Possible Worlds, and Other Papers, Harper & Brothers, New York — London 1928, p. 286.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  10. Hehenberger Elisabeth, Boscaro Vittorio, James Erick R., Hirakawa Yoshihisa, Trznadel Morelia, Mtawali Mahara, Fiorito Rebecca, del Campo Javier, Karnkowska Anna, Kolisko Martin, Irwin Nicholas A. T., Mathur Varsha, Scheffrahn Rudolf H., and Keeling Patrick J., New Parabasalia Symbionts Snyderella spp. and Daimonympha gen. nov. from South American Rugitermes Termites and the Parallel Evolution of A Cell with a Rotating »Head«, Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 2023, A e12987, https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12987.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12987
  11. Kratz Anton, Kim Minkyu, Kelly Marcus R., Zheng Fan, Koczor Christopher A., Li Jianfeng, Ono Keiichiro, Qin Yue, Churas Christopher, Chen Jing, Pillich Rudolf T., Park Jisoo, Modak Maya, Collier Rachel, and Licon Kate, A Multi-Scale Map of Protein Assemblies in the DNA Damage Response, Cell Systems 2023, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 447–463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2023.04.007.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2023.04.007
  12. Miller Kenneth R., The Flagellum Unspun: The Collapse of »Irreducible Complexity«, in: Michael Ruse and William Dembski (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA, Cambridge University Press, New York 2004, pp. 81–97.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804823.006
  13. Nagel Thomas, The Last Word, Oxford University Press, New York 1997, pp. 160–161.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  14. Roberts Noel Keith, Newman on the Argument from Design, New Blackfriars 2007, Vol. 88, No. 1013, pp. 56–66, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2006.00133.x.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2006.00133.x
  15. Salmon Wesley C., Religion and Science: A New Look at Hume’s »Dialogues«, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 1978, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 143–176, https://tiny.pl/c7x6n [22.06.2023].
    Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571884
  16. Wasman Erich, Catholics and Evolution, in: The Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol. 5, Robert Appleton Company, New York 1909, pp. 654–670.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  17. Whitehead Dion J., Wilke Claus O., Vernazobres David, and Bornberg-Baue Erich, The Look-Ahead Effect of Phenotypic Mutations, Biol Direct 2008, Vol. 3, No. 18, https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-18.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-3-18