Tom 18 (2021)
Artykuły

Theistic Evolution: Scientific, Philosophical and Theological Concerns

PDF (English)
  • Robert Larmer
Robert Larmer
University of New Brunswick

Opublikowane 01.04.2022 — zaktualizowane 01.04.2022

Wersje

Słowa kluczowe

  • theistic evolution,
  • methodological naturalism,
  • God of the gaps,
  • human nature,
  • libertarian free will,
  • life after death,
  • BioLogos,
  • Nancey Murphy
    • ...More
    Less

Prawa autorskie (c) 2022 Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy

Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Jak cytować

Larmer, Robert. “Theistic Evolution: Scientific, Philosophical and Theological Concerns”. Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy , vol. 18, Apr. 2022, https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2021.18.8.

Abstrakt

In this paper, I explore scientific, philosophical, and theological concerns that arise from adopting theistic evolution understood as claiming that the origin and development of life can be entirely accounted for in terms of the operation of natural causes, without any need to posit direct divine intervention. I argue that theistic evolutionists’ commitment to methodological naturalism and their unjustified rejection of gap arguments suggests that their case is not nearly so strong as they suggest. I further argue that accepting theistic evolution most naturally leads to accepting a monistic physicalist account of the person that is at odds with theism’s understanding of human nature.

PDF (English)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

  1. “Are Gaps in Scientific Knowledge Evidence for God?, BioLogos, https://tiny.pl/9nlkm [17.10.2021].
  2. Behe Michael J., A Mousetrap for Darwin: Michael J. Behe Answers His Critics, Discovery Institute Press, Seattle 2020.
  3. BioLogos Editorial Team, “Divine Action and the Meaning of «Creation», BioLogos 2015, January 27, https://tiny.pl/9nlf4 [17.10.2021].
  4. Bishop John, Natural Agency: An Essay on the Causal Theory of Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.
  5. Chaberek Michael, “Thomas Aquinas on Creation, and the Argument for Theistic Evolution from Commentary on Sentences, Book II, EPS Article Library 2015, https://tiny.pl/9nlpt [17.10.2021].
  6. Chubb Thomas, A Collection of Tracts on Various Subjects, Vol. II, Pt. I, London 1743.
  7. Chubb Thomas, “A Vindication of the Author’s Short Dissertation on Providence, in: Chubb, A Collection of Tracts….
  8. Cohen Robert S. and Laudan Larry (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Vol. 76, D. Reidel, Dordrecht 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7
  9. Cooper John W., Body, Soul, & Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debate, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, Michigan 1989.
  10. Culp John, “Panentheism, in: Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy…, https://tiny.pl/9npdq [17.10.2021].
  11. Forrest Barbara, “Methodological Naturalism and Philosophical Naturalism: Clarifying the Connection, Philo 2000, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 7–29, https://tiny.pl/9nllg [17.10.2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philo20003213
  12. Ganssle Greg, “God of the Gaps’ Arguments, in: Stump and Padgett (eds.), The Blackwell Companion…, pp. 130–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118241455.ch12
  13. George Marie, “On Attempts to Salvage Paley’s Argument from Design, Jacques Maritain Center: Thomistic Institute, https://tiny.pl/9npd1 [17.10.2021].
  14. Giberson Karl, Saving Darwin: How to Be a Christian and Believe in Evolution, HarperCollins, New York 2008.
  15. Kim Jaegwon, Philosophy of Mind, 3rd ed., Westview Press, Cambridge 2011.
  16. Klinghoffer David (ed.), Debating Darwin’s Doubt: A Scientific Controversy that Can No Longer Be Denied, Discovery Institute Press, Seattle 2015.
  17. Koperski Jeffrey, The Physics of Theism: God, Physics, and the Philosophy of Science, Wiley Blackwell, West Sussex 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118933800
  18. Lamoureux Denis O., “Evolutionary Creation: A Christian Approach to Evolution, BioLogos, https://tiny.pl/9npdr [17.10.2021].
  19. Larmer Robert, “Is There Anything Wrong with «God of the Gaps» Reasoning?, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2002, Vol. 52, pp. 129–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020832916983
  20. Laudan Larry, “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem, in: Cohen and Laudan (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis…, pp. 111–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7055-7_6
  21. Mazur Susan, The Origin of Life Circus: A How To Make Life Extravaganza, Caswell, New York 2016.
  22. McDonald Patrick and Tro Nivaldo, “In Defense of Methodological Naturalism, Christian Scholars’ Review 2009, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 201–229.
  23. Meyer Stephen C., Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design, Harper Collins, New York 2009.
  24. Morgan Thomas, Physico-theology: Or, a Philosophico-moral Disquisition Concerning Human Nature, Free Agency, Moral Government, and Divine Providence, T. Cox, London 1741.
  25. Morgan Thomas, The Moral Philosopher, London 1738.
  26. Murphy Nancey, “Divine Action in the Natural Order, in: Russell, Murphy, and Peacocke (eds.), Chaos and Complexity…, pp. 325–357.
  27. Murphy Nancey, Bodies and Souls, or Spirited Bodies?, Current Issues in Theology, No. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802805
  28. Nelson Paul, “Methodological Naturalism: A Rule That No One Needs Or Obeys, in: Klinghoffer (ed.), Debating Darwin’s Doubt…, pp. 285–294.
  29. Peacocke Arthur, Evolution: The Disguised Friend of Faith?, Templeton Press, Philadelphia 2004.
  30. Peacocke Arthur, Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming — Natural, Divine and Human, Blackwell, Oxford 1990.
  31. Ratzsch Del, Nature, Design, and Science: The Status of Design in Natural Science, SUNY Series in Philosophy and Biology, SUNY Press, New York 2001.
  32. Russell Robert John, Murphy Nancey, and Peacocke Arthur (eds.), Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, Vatican Observatory 1995.
  33. Searle John, Minds, Brains and Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1984.
  34. Silva Ignacio, “A Cause among Causes? God Acting in the Natural World, European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2015, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 99–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v7i4.89
  35. Snoke David, “In Favor of God-of-the-Gaps Reasoning, Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 2001, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 152–158.
  36. Stenmark Mikael, “Panentheism and Its Neighbours, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2019, Vol. 85, pp. 23–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-018-9687-9
  37. Stump James and Padgett Alan (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118241455
  38. Thaxton Charles B., Bradley Walter L., Olsen Roger L., Tour James, Meyer Stephen C., Wells Jonathan, Gonzalez Guillermo, Miller Brian, and Klinghoffer David, The Mystery of Life’s Origin: The Continuing Controversy, Discovery Institute Press, Seattle 2020.
  39. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles: On the Truth of the Catholic Faith, trans. Anton C. Pegis, James F. Anderson, Vernon J. Bourke and Charles J. O'Neil, Hanover House, New York 1955–1957, https://tiny.pl/9nl2g [17.10.2021].
  40. Tkacz Michael W., “Aquinas vs. Intelligent Design, Catholic Answers Magazine 2008, Vol. 19, No. 9, https://tiny.pl/9npdc [17.10.2021].
  41. Tour James, “We’re Still Clueless about the Origin of Life, in: Thaxton, Bradley, Olsen, Tour, Meyer, Wells, Gonzalez, Miller, and Klinghoffer, The Mystery of Life’s Origin…, pp. 323–357.
  42. Tracy Thomas, “Particular Providence and the God of the Gaps, in: Russell, Murphy, and Peacocke (eds.), Chaos and Complexity…, pp. 289–324.
  43. “What We Believe, BioLogos, https://tiny.pl/9npdh [17.10.2021].
  44. Wiles Maurice, God’s Action in the World: The Bampton Lectures for 1986, SCM Press, London 1986.
  45. Zalta Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2021 Edition.