Tom 13 (2016)
Polemiki

Darwin's Greatest Secret Exposed: Response to Grzegorz Malec's De Facto Fact Denying Review of My Book

Opublikowane 24.05.2021 — zaktualizowane 24.02.2023

Wersje

Słowa kluczowe

  • Darwin,
  • Matthew,
  • misrepresentation,
  • bias,
  • fact denial,
  • historic revisionism
  • ...więcej
    mniej

Jak cytować

Sutton M., Darwin’s Greatest Secret Exposed: Response to Grzegorz Malec’s De Facto Fact Denying Review of My Book, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, 2023, t. 13, s. 287-296, https://doi.org/10.53763/fag.2016.13.135

Abstrakt

Grzegorz Malec’s “There Is No Darwin’s Greatest Secret”, a review of my book Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s Greatest Secret, takes one extremely minor finding from my book and, despite his best efforts, manages to disconfirm just one of thirty examples of that minor finding. He then takes that one disconfirmed mere minor example and presents it as evidence that he has disconfirmed all the original major findings in my book. By so doing, his deceptive review goes far beyond the counter-academic deviance of mere cherry picking, it is more a case of gross misrepresentation to the point of de facto fact denial amounting to historic revisionist behaviour.

Pobrania

Brak dostęþnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Bibliografia

  1. Cohen Stanley, States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering, Polity, Cambridge 2001.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  2. Darwin Charles R., “Natural Selection”, Gardeners’ Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette 21 April 1860, no. 16, pp. 362-363.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  3. Darwin Charles R., On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 1st ed., John Murray, London 1859.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  4. Darwin Charles R., On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 3rd ed., John Murray, London 1861.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  5. De Beer Gavin, “The Wilkins Lecture: The Origins of Darwin’s Ideas on Evolution and Natural Selection”, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 1962, vol. 155, no. 960, pp. 321-338.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  6. Kuhn Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., enlarged, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1962.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  7. Malec Grzegorz, “There Is No Darwin’s Greatest Secret”, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2015, vol. 12, pp. 325-331, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/images/FAG/2015.t.12/art.10.pdf (19.06.2016).
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  8. Matthew Patrick, Letter to The Gardeners’ Chronicle, “Nature’s Law of Selection”, Gardeners’ Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette 7 April 1860, pp. 312-313.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  9. Matthew Patrick, Letter to The Gardeners’ Chronicle, “Nature’s Law of Selection”, Gardeners’ Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette 12 May 1860, p. 433.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  10. Matthew Patrick, On Naval Timber and Arboriculture; With a Critical Note on Authors Who Have Recently Treated the Subject of Planting, Adam Black, Edinburgh — Longmans and Co., London 1831.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  11. Mayr Ernst, The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1982.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  12. Sutton Mike, Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s Greatest Secret, Thinker Books, Thinker Media Inc., Cary, North Carolina 2014.
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  13. Sutton Mike, “On Knowledge Contamination: New Data Challenges Claims of Darwin’s and Wallace’s Independent Conceptions of Matthew’s Prior-Published Hypothesis”, Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy 2015, vol. 12, pp. 167-205, http://www.nauka-a-religia.uz.zgora.pl/images/FAG/2015.t.12/art.05.pdf (19.06.2016).
    Zobacz w Google Scholar
  14. Sutton Mike, “On the First to be Second (F2b2) Hypothesis”, Dysology and Criminology: The Blog of Mike Sutton 2015, https://www.bestthinking.com/thinkers/science/social_sciences/sociology/mike-sutton?tab=blog&blogpostid=22763%2c22763 (19.06.2016).
    Zobacz w Google Scholar